What about this?
http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Parq?content=55486
So, where's the connection to Gnome... or even Linux for that matter? Or do you just want to show the world that Linux users are a bunch of _tree_huggers_?
Beside the point that ladies have aesthetics form of body the popularity of watching them here on gnome-look.org is not the first point of interest.
I especially am here to make make themes for others to make their Linux system be more aesthetics and I leave my devote to the other sex out in the real world.
I am not alone with this thought, just look at the votes:
splashgril2
Score: 33% good
Parq
Score: 75% good
Well, the downloads are high on those. But what is your real intention with promoting them Simzer? Would you like to see more naked bodies on this site, because people downloading them much?
I picked that particularly high rated image to emphasise my point that if we take a picture of pretty looking tree(s) and a picture of pretty looking girl(s), for some reason people here will appear fancy the tree more than the girl even though (most) people have a natural attraction to the opposite sex. And I might add, an attraction that usually is
more strong in a man to a woman, than a man to a tree.
I'm also saying that a lot of people here have mixed ideas about weather or not they want pictures of girls on gnome-look.
It seems that from this example, we don't and we rated it 33%. But girl_by_wolf is rated 71% and it has more nudity than this picture, which is contradictory to the idea that we don't want pictures of attractive girls here.
Why?
Right. The answer is simple. People have more aberration on the opposite sex then on trees (exception might be the lumberman). Giving a possibility to restimulating their missemotion is against the role of creation and makes the opposite effect. The sexual content sites are for that purpose. I do not want them personally.
Well if you feel that you don't want something on gnome-look feel free to keep it to yourself, because nobody wants to hear an angry person post grammatically incorrect ramblings regarding his opinions towards the content of a web-site designed to assist one with making their GUI look nice.
So please tell why people like girl_by_wolf and not splashgril2?
And I am sorry, missemotion isn't a word. :)
Ratings & Comments
10 Comments
She's hot, leave her alone. If you like the gd gnome logo so much, get a friggin tattoo.
So, where's the connection to Gnome... or even Linux for that matter? Or do you just want to show the world that Linux users are a bunch of pervs?
What about this? http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Parq?content=55486 So, where's the connection to Gnome... or even Linux for that matter? Or do you just want to show the world that Linux users are a bunch of _tree_huggers_?
Beside the point that ladies have aesthetics form of body the popularity of watching them here on gnome-look.org is not the first point of interest. I especially am here to make make themes for others to make their Linux system be more aesthetics and I leave my devote to the other sex out in the real world. I am not alone with this thought, just look at the votes: splashgril2 Score: 33% good Parq Score: 75% good
http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/girl_by_wolf?content=35794 Downloads 43698 http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Ubuntu+Babe?content=24467 Downloads: 46841 ... downloaded becouse of the ubuntu logos:)
Well, the downloads are high on those. But what is your real intention with promoting them Simzer? Would you like to see more naked bodies on this site, because people downloading them much?
I picked that particularly high rated image to emphasise my point that if we take a picture of pretty looking tree(s) and a picture of pretty looking girl(s), for some reason people here will appear fancy the tree more than the girl even though (most) people have a natural attraction to the opposite sex. And I might add, an attraction that usually is more strong in a man to a woman, than a man to a tree. I'm also saying that a lot of people here have mixed ideas about weather or not they want pictures of girls on gnome-look. It seems that from this example, we don't and we rated it 33%. But girl_by_wolf is rated 71% and it has more nudity than this picture, which is contradictory to the idea that we don't want pictures of attractive girls here. Why?
Right. The answer is simple. People have more aberration on the opposite sex then on trees (exception might be the lumberman). Giving a possibility to restimulating their missemotion is against the role of creation and makes the opposite effect. The sexual content sites are for that purpose. I do not want them personally.
Well if you feel that you don't want something on gnome-look feel free to keep it to yourself, because nobody wants to hear an angry person post grammatically incorrect ramblings regarding his opinions towards the content of a web-site designed to assist one with making their GUI look nice. So please tell why people like girl_by_wolf and not splashgril2? And I am sorry, missemotion isn't a word. :)
You are right, missemotion is a typo. The correct spelling is misemotion.