like with movies -- if there is violence, guns, shootings, blood -- they are still suitable for "children" above 12 years old. But even if there is a single sex scene -- the film is not allowed for persons under 18 years.
Crazy?
Yeh, you know boobs can destroy the Earth, I guess. I'm shocked we haven't seen a torrent of broken-English posts objecting that they clicked the download link of a wallpaper that was clearly going to contain nudity, only to freak out because they discovered she was nude.
Nude Girls rock.
Personally I like it and don't have a problem with it. I do have a problem with the fact that my six year old could see it. This is adult content and when you click the download link, there is no age verification to attempt to stop underage people from seeing it. At least make them lie about their age before they can download it.
Like children are always truthful when you put a simple age-question in place here...
Ok, seriously. IMHO seeing a naked body is a natural thing and nothing kids should be shielded from (and don't confuse this with porn, different story altogether)?
But actually this is not my point. What I find problematic is that you as a parent try to put your very responsibility into someone else's hand. If you don't want your child to see this type of stuff that don't let it surf the internet freely! Same goes for TV, you have to control which shows your children are allowed to watch and which ones not. You don't seriously expect everyone else to do your job, do you?!
"At least make them lie about their age before they can download it"
LOL what would be the point to that.
pornography is one thing, but why are people so uptight about nudity? your born naked, die naked, if your not physically attracted to the naked opposit sex it means you have issues.
but god for bid dont let american teenagers see nudity.. just sexually repress them so they turn into sexual deviants later in life.
nice girl, beautiful body, no connection with linux or gnome, but why should we care?
just check out the number of downloads for a period of one single day ,-)
now at least I know the face of this girl:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Pixel+Girl?content=18179
My comment was sarcasm. I thought I was stating the obvious. I'm not in favor of censorship, but I think Gnome and KDE-Look.org should ban this type of wallpaper. They are in poor taste and make the Linux community look like a bunch of perverts.
M.
heh... there's PLENTY of "ubuntu girl" wallpapers on here. let sabayon have one unique... for now.
even though sabayon is #3 on distro watch, it's got nearly no publicity!
oh, sorry about that, I know partial nudity seems a bit much. but any nude bits are covered in the previews,so you won't actually see any naughty bits unless you click download. I figured that's a decent compromise. ?
Ratings & Comments
19 Comments
like with movies -- if there is violence, guns, shootings, blood -- they are still suitable for "children" above 12 years old. But even if there is a single sex scene -- the film is not allowed for persons under 18 years. Crazy?
Yeh, you know boobs can destroy the Earth, I guess. I'm shocked we haven't seen a torrent of broken-English posts objecting that they clicked the download link of a wallpaper that was clearly going to contain nudity, only to freak out because they discovered she was nude. Nude Girls rock.
Personally I like it and don't have a problem with it. I do have a problem with the fact that my six year old could see it. This is adult content and when you click the download link, there is no age verification to attempt to stop underage people from seeing it. At least make them lie about their age before they can download it.
Like children are always truthful when you put a simple age-question in place here... Ok, seriously. IMHO seeing a naked body is a natural thing and nothing kids should be shielded from (and don't confuse this with porn, different story altogether)? But actually this is not my point. What I find problematic is that you as a parent try to put your very responsibility into someone else's hand. If you don't want your child to see this type of stuff that don't let it surf the internet freely! Same goes for TV, you have to control which shows your children are allowed to watch and which ones not. You don't seriously expect everyone else to do your job, do you?!
"At least make them lie about their age before they can download it" LOL what would be the point to that. pornography is one thing, but why are people so uptight about nudity? your born naked, die naked, if your not physically attracted to the naked opposit sex it means you have issues. but god for bid dont let american teenagers see nudity.. just sexually repress them so they turn into sexual deviants later in life.
This is something I didn't expect to see here, it shows the brain capacity of a ant...or hormonal teen.
i don't get why same people say these kinds of things shouldn't be allowed here. it doesn't show anything in the preview and it is a cool wallpaper
nice girl, beautiful body, no connection with linux or gnome, but why should we care? just check out the number of downloads for a period of one single day ,-) now at least I know the face of this girl: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Pixel+Girl?content=18179
Yes, it s a nice pic with a beautifull women. Perhaps would be necessary it to work the image with gimp to create a link with linux ;)
"link with linux" what the hell do you think sabayon is?
I thought of a more important modification of the image than a logo stuck above;) Where did you find this nice pic, please?
My comment was sarcasm. I thought I was stating the obvious. I'm not in favor of censorship, but I think Gnome and KDE-Look.org should ban this type of wallpaper. They are in poor taste and make the Linux community look like a bunch of perverts. M.
I agree. This wallpaper is very ugly in a site like gnome-look :s
I agree.
Ha ha. You are not in favor of censorship but you are in favor of censorship. Seriously, I don’t like these wallpapers, I don’t use them as wallpapers, but I don’t care if some of us make or like them. I think that the biggest problem about them is not their existence but the ©, most of them are improperly GPL’d.
How about an Ubuntu wallpaper? :) M.
heh... there's PLENTY of "ubuntu girl" wallpapers on here. let sabayon have one unique... for now. even though sabayon is #3 on distro watch, it's got nearly no publicity!
We already talked about this in Gnome-look. This kind of pictures are considered adult pictures and this is NOT an adult site.
oh, sorry about that, I know partial nudity seems a bit much. but any nude bits are covered in the previews,so you won't actually see any naughty bits unless you click download. I figured that's a decent compromise. ?